United States v. Harris

(after stating facts as above).

I felt when the motion was first urged yesterday that the question raised was immaterial, so far as the result in this particular case is concerned. For, assuming the contention to be correct, and applicable to this situation, in view of the fact that the two sentences have been ordered to run concurrently, the defendant cannot be harmed by the fact that he was sentenced on both counts.

However, the possible effect of the two sentences on the parole of the defendant has led me to study the legal aspects of the problem.

Such study convinces me that the sentences…