Legal Opinion

Escobar v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 17, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendant is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs in an underlying action, the plaintiffs appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated May 12, 2004, which denied their cross motion for summary judgment striking the defendant’s answer, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and declared that the defendant is not obligated to defend or indemnify them.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Government Employees Insurance v. KliglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Ezrasons, Inc. v. American Credit Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Monteleone v. Crow Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Serravillo v. Sterling InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nunez v. Long Island Jewish Medical Center-Schneider Children's HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Nabutovsky v. Burlington InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API