Legal Opinion

Matson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal f rom Seott Ovreuit Gourt. .Action to recover damages for a personal injury. There was a demurrer to the petition, which was sustained. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRotiieock, J.

It is averred in the petition “ that on or about May 5, 18S3, plaintiff was a servant and employe of defendant, being engaged as a member of a construction gang, whose duties required him to go upon the cars and trains of defendant, and ride upon the same, and to work about, upon and around said trains and the tracks upon which they were run, and, as a gravel-train man, his sole and only duties required constant labor about, around and upon trains, both while stationary and in motion; that he was about defendant’s ears and trains and upon defendant’s main track, and had just ridden upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Malone v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArterySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Butler v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Dunn v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Njus v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API