Legal Opinion

State v. Schindler

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 14, 2016No. 121189; A154305PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

In State v. Mills, 354 Or 350, 369-70, 372-73, 312 P3d 515 (2013), the Supreme Court held that the right to a trial in a particular place protected by Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution is a procedural “right not to be dragged away to a distant place of trial — a right that would be subject to waiver if not asserted” and resolved in a timely manner before trial. In so doing, the court reversed 90 years of precedent holding that, under Article I, section 11,1 venue was a material element of any criminal offense that had to be proved by the prosecution beyond a reasonable doubt,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. MillsOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. WeilertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  4. State v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McCrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API