Schuman v. Hertz Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings. The record before us indicates that the dismissal of the original suit was not intended by the Justice presiding to be a dismissal for neglect to prosecute. We call particular attention to the fact that the same Justice who dismissed the original action also denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this complaint on the grounds that the original one had not been dismissed for neglect *606to prosecute. Since this action was timely commenced, it…
2Cited by11 opinions
- Andrea v. Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects & Landscape Architects, P.C.New York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Kelly v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Freedman v. New York Hospital Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Keel v. Parke, Davis & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Villanova v. King Kullen SupermarketsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.