Legal Opinion
Noma Electric Corp. v. M. Goldman & Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided July 13, 1932No. 2112PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, District Judge.
This is the usual bill in equity charging the defendant with infringement of letters patent No. 1,512,888 issued to Lester Haft on October 21, 1921, on an application filed March 11, 1921. By mesne assignment title to the patent vests in the plaintiff.
There are three claims in the patent. The first and second are relied upon, and they read:
“1. A unitary Christmas tree lighting sot comprising an attachment plug adapted to be inserted in a standard lamp- socket, a plurality of miniature lamps connected together in series, lead wires connecting said lamps with the eireuit…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Noma Electric Corp. v. Leo Pollock Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935