Legal Opinion

Acton v. Jackson County

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1993No. WD 46089Published

1Opinion of the Court

SPINDEN, Judge.

When Jackson County authorities refused to permit Keith Acton to operate a massage parlor at 8603 East Truman Road as a nonconforming use, Acton sued for a declaratory judgment and injunction. He claimed that he should be exempted from complying with county zoning requirements for massage parlors because he was endeavoring to continue a nonconforming use which had existed since 1974 or earlier. The trial court agreed with Acton. The *448county appealed. We reverse the trial court’s judgment.

The county appealed on two grounds, but we do not reach the second point because we find…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thummel v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Hanna v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Keeven v. City of HazelwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Boyce Industries, Inc. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API