Legal Opinion

In Re Zinke's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1926No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Doubtless the service of notice may be waived by a general appearance in the case and jurisdiction over the person may be obtained. Whether the consent to continuance amounted to a waiver we need not decide as we are satisfied the court properly granted the motion to dismiss on the other ground, and this motion went to the jurisdiction of the court over the subject-matter.

While the proceeding under the statute above quoted is not, strictly speaking, an appeal from the probate court, it partakes of that nature (Newell v. Kalamazoo Circuit Judge,215 Mich. 153; Freeman v. Wayne Probate Judge,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re Simon's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Newell v. Kalamazoo Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Tipson v. JeannotMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Freeman v. Wayne Probate JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Butts v. RuthvenMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In Re Powers EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  3. In Re Powers EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In Re Reid's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Union Trust Co. v. AngellMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API