Maupin v. Meadow Park Manor

¶10 I concur in the Court’s Opinion and write separately to address the argument made by the limited partnership, Meadow Park Manor.

¶11 The sequence of relevant events in this matter is:

7/30/97 The partnership, Meadow Park, was formed.

8/29/01 Ms. Dorr is distributed a partnership interest in Meadow Park.

4/16/02 Meadow Park files its certificate of limited partnership *418with the Montana Secretary of State.

2/18/04 The accident in question occurs.

11/15/04 Ms. Maupin files her complaint.

¶12 At the time of the accident in question, and when the complaint was filed, Meadow Park was a limited…