Legal Opinion

Knox v. Brown

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1925No. Motion No. 6863Published

1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.

The plaintiff in error earnestly contends that the Court of Civil Appeals, as well as the Commission of Appeals, have grievously erred in holding in this case that the option of the plaintiff in error to repurchase the land expired on June 1, 1923, under the facts shown by the record, and cites again in support of his contention Keen v. Logan, 147 La. 80, 84 So. 501; Leonard v. Busch, 139 La. 1099, 72 So. 749; Hodges v. Miller (Tex. Civ. App.) 244 S. W. 634; and Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. Patton (Tex. Com. App.) 238 S. W. 202. In view of the earnest insistence of counsel representing the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Busch-Everett Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Hodges v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Keen v. LoganSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API