Legal Opinion

People v. Barnes

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 29, 2017No. 1-14-2886UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ellis

*971 ¶ 1 A case involving the senseless and tragic death of an innocent bystander presents a relatively novel question of statutory interpretation on appeal: What does it mean for two or more people to be "acting together" as required to commit the offense of mob action? See 720 ILCS 5/25-1(a)(1) (West 2008). Defendant Tyrone Barnes and an unidentified man shot at each other on the street, resulting in the death of an innocent bystander. A jury acquitted defendant of felony murder but convicted him of armed violence predicated on mob action. The theory of the predicate charge was that defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Boyle v. LandrySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
  5. People v. DavisIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. BarnesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  2. People v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  3. State v. RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Patrick Dale Burton-Hill v. State of Alaska, Jerald Dwayne Burton Jr. v. State of Alaska, Marcus Djaun Howard v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2025
  5. State v. RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API