Legal Opinion
In re Lax
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 1, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent Fred Mark Lax was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department *343on June 19, 1995. At all times relevant to these proceedings, respondent maintained his principal place of business within the First Judicial Department.
In 2009, respondent was charged in a superior court information filed in Supreme Court, New York County, with grand larceny in the second degree (Penal Law § 155.40 [1]), a class C felony, and grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 155.35), a class D felony, and scheme to defraud in the first…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- In re SheinbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re BerenholtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re CaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of LessoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017