Legal Opinion

Smith v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1960No. Civ. 25072PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J. pro tern. *

Petitioner is the defendant in an action by which he is charged by the district attorney, through an information, with the violation of section 4234, Business and Professions Code, in that he did furnish to one Linda Phillips (hereinafter called “Phillips”), a minor of the age of 20 years, certain dangerous drugs. His motion made pursuant to section 995 of the Penal Code to set aside the information, having been denied, he here pursuant to section 995a of the Penal Code, seeks a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court from proceeding under that information.

Th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re TartarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. VassarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. In Re Baby Boy T.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Gibson v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Choff v. SvendsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API