Legal Opinion

Sherrard v. Nevius

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Nevius and others brought an action of debt against Wooley and Sherrard. The suit was founded on a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of War*242ren county, in New Jersey. The process in the present suit was returned, as to Wooley, not found.

Sherrard filed three pleas. The first plea was rejected on the plaintiff’s motion. The second plea, so far as it is necessary to state it, is as follows:

That one McMillan had fraudulently appeared and confessed the action mentioned in the declaration, without any authority to appear and answer to said action for him (Sherrard). This plea also avers, that…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harshey v. BlackmarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  2. Wiley v. PrattIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Hirsch Bros. & Co. v. R. E. Kennington Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Sarasota Ice, Fish & Power Co. v. Lyle & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1907
  5. Weems v. VowellMississippi Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API