Straughan v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DIAMANTIS, Judge.
Scott Allan Straughan appeals, claiming that his sentence is illegal because it extends the period of his state supervision beyond the maximum five-year period allowed by law for *846a third-degree felony. We agree and, therefore, reverse.
In February 1992, the trial court placed appellant on two years drug-offender probation for the third-degree felony of possession of cannabis in excess of 20 grams.1 After appellant had completed approximately one year of probation, he violated the terms of his probation. As a result, the trial court revoked his probation and resentenced him to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Ogden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Summers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- State v. KendrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Phillips v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Eanes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Eanes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Burkey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Olson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.