Legal Opinion

Straughan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 6, 1994No. 93-817PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIAMANTIS, Judge.

Scott Allan Straughan appeals, claiming that his sentence is illegal because it extends the period of his state supervision beyond the maximum five-year period allowed by law for *846a third-degree felony. We agree and, therefore, reverse.

In February 1992, the trial court placed appellant on two years drug-offender probation for the third-degree felony of possession of cannabis in excess of 20 grams.1 After appellant had completed approximately one year of probation, he violated the terms of his probation. As a result, the trial court revoked his probation and resentenced him to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Ogden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Summers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. State v. KendrickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Eanes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Eanes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Burkey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Olson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API