Valley Bank v. Larson
Idaho Supreme Court
1DissentShepard, Justice
Although the majority opinion has accurately recited the facts, it has, I suggest, ignored the. standard which at summary judgment requires that those facts and all inferences legitimately flowing therefrom be construed in a light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment is sought, i.e., the guarantor. So construed, in my opinion, the facts and the legitimate inferences arising therefrom make summary judgment inappropriate here. I also disagree with the determination of the majority that the guarantor herein received from the creditor Valley Bank all of the protections for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Industrial Investment Corp. v. RoccaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- McGill v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Mechanics & Metals National Bank of New York v. PingreeIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
- First Piedmont Bank and Trust Company v. DoyleIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. WhitworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.