Legal Opinion

In Re Ennis

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided January 27, 1995No. 19-40148PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION

KAREN M. SEE, Bankruptcy Judge.

Pro se debtor Carolyn Ennis filed two notices of appeal without the required filing fees, but accompanied by two affidavits of financial status. There was no motion to proceed informa pauperis, but the affidavits reference such a motion, so debtors apparently seek to appeal two orders without paying the filing fees. The orders appealed from include rulings denying requests to proceed in forma pauperis in the bankruptcy case and ordering debtors to pay the balance of the filing fee for the Chapter 13 case…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. In Re Jon Robert Perroton, Debtor. Jon Robert Perroton v. Nancy L.G. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. In Re Arkansas Communities, Inc., and International Land Corp. Robert J. Brown and R.J. Brown, P.A. v. Maurice MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. In Re FitzgeraldUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  5. In Re MooreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Merritt (In Re Merritt)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · 1995
  2. In Re McMullenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
  3. Barham v. Barham (In Re Barham)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1996
  4. In Re LambUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1997
  5. In Re LarsenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API