Legal Opinion
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v. Mendoza
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 23, 2010No. 09-CV-525PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (“HSBC”) appeals from the denial of its application pursuant to Superior Court Civil Rule 24(a)(2) to intervene as of right in a suit for breach of a contract to sell real property. 1 By intervening, HSBC seeks to protect its rights under a deed of trust and an equitable lien on the property. We hold that leave to intervene should have been granted.
I
The litigation before us concerns the disposition of property located at 526 Tuckerman Street in Northwest Washington, D.C. The house at that address was appellee Ana Mendoza’s residence. In April…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Utah Ass'n of Counties v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Grutter v. BollingerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ward v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- OneWest Bank, FSB v. MarshallDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- M.D. v. R.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- April J. Ward and James L. Scales v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and James L. Scales and April J. Ward v. Wachovia Mortgage Prentice Hall Corporation SystemDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Capital Bank, N.A. v. Cornerstone Capital, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.