Legal Opinion

Spencer D. And Mary Jane Stewart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 13, 1984No. 83-1731PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service determined a deficiency in Spencer and Mary Stewart’s 1969 and 1970 tax returns based on the reporting of two transactions: the sale of a water utility system and a sale of securities. The Stew-arts paid the deficiencies and sued for a refund. The district court found three errors in the Commissioner’s determination, and entered judgment for $50,168.81. The government challenges the following three determinations made by the district court:

1. Interest the City of Phoenix paid the Stewarts on the deferred payment of the purchase price of a water…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. H. O. Williams and Mrs. Ada L. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Rhoads v. McFerranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Spencer D. Stewart, Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. West v. CostenDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thrifty Oil Co. & Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  2. DeNaples v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. DeNaples v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  4. AJF Inspections Incorporated v. IOC Franchising LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
  5. DeNAPLES v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API