Legal Opinion
Daly v. Natural Resources Board
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 29, 1973No. 218, 219PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.
The appellants contend (1) that the proceeding before the DNR was a contested case and not a legislative hearing, (2) that due process “fair-play” requirements of ch. 227, Stats., for a contested case were not complied with, (3) that the notice requirements of sec. 31.06 (2) were not complied with, and (4) that findings of fact of the DNR were not supported by “substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole.”
A brief résumé of some historical facts of Menominee county may be helpful in discussing the position of the parties and the issues before the court.
In 1854, the United States…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Menominee Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Muench v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Town of Ashwaubenon v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Gateway City Transfer Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
- Copland v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- J.F. Ahern Co. v. Wisconsin State Building CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.