Legal Opinion

Hosking v. Southern Pacific Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,402PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Tort. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. William N. Cottbell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chytbaus

Defendant in error raises the objection that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain this writ of error. The objection is based upon the procedure in the court below. The judgment complained of was rendered and entered of record on December 24, 1907. At that time plaintiff in error made an oral motion for a new trial which was overruled and, after such ruling, a motion in arrest of judgment, which was also overruled. On January 18, 1908, plaintiff in error filed a written motion as follows:

“Now comes the defendant, by its attorney, John Maynard Harlan, and moves the court to set aside its…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Kingman v. Western Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. McFaddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. People ex rel. Munson v. GaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Hearson v. GraudineIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlas Finishing Co. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API