Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Tate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1974No. Appeal, 1395Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

I agree with the majority that the in-court identifications of appellant made by Bobert Crawford and Nathaniel Williams were properly allowed into evi*207deuce. 1 cannot agree, however, that Officer Brennan’s in-court identification was properly admitted1 or that its admission was harmless error.

While searching the area of the robbery, Officers Brennan and Smith drove past a small side street and *208noticed two men in the middle of the block. As the officers drove north on the street, the men darted ont of an alley. One carried a rifle and a television set; the other…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. CampanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. RichmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API