Legal Opinion

Rubin-Schneiderman v. Merit Behavioral Care Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 10, 2001No. 00 Civ. 8101(JSM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

MARTIN, District Judge.

Eric Rubin-Schneiderman (“Plaintiff’) originally filed this action against Merit Behavioral Care Corp. (“Merit”), Sati Ah-luwalia, M.D. (“Dr.Ahluwalia”), and Empire Blue Cross and Blue Shield (“Empire Blue Cross”) (collectively “Defendants”) in New York Supreme Court. Defendants removed the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441 on the grounds that Plaintiffs claims are completely preempted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a). Plaintiff now moves to remand the case to state court. For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Michael A. Lupo v. Human Affairs International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Mattie Tolton and Ronald Tolton v. American Biodyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Willis Hope White v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. MacRo v. Independent Health Ass'n, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2001
  2. Waldschmidt v. Aetna U.S. HealthcareDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Difelice v. Aetna HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  4. Difelice v. Aetna U.S. HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Difelice v. Aetna U.S. HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API