Legal Opinion

Kawolsky v. McDougal Hartmann Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 29, 1980No. 79-359PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stengel

Plaintiff Sharon Kawolsky filed suit against defendant McDougal Hartmann Company, among others, to recover for the death of her husband. At issue upon appeal is the sufficiency of count I of plaintiffs second amended complaint wherein she alleged that defendant had been a contractor engaged in the construction of Route 24 in Peoria County; that at 11:42 p.m. on November 22, 1976, a pickup truck operated by Frank Kawolsky collided with a flatbed semitrailer which was used in the construction work; that defendant was the general contractor in charge of construction with the right to stop the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Barthel v. Illinois Central Gulf RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Schultz v. Henry Ericsson Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Carterville Coal Co. v. AbbottIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Richard v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vegich v. McDougal Hartmann Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Loschiavo v. Greco Contractors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Vegich v. McDougal Hartmann Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API