Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pierce Wrapping Mach. Co. v. Terkelsen Mach. Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 14, 1924No. 1883Published

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, District Judge.

In this equity suit the plaintiff alleges infringement of five patents:,(1) The wrapping'patent, No. 1,153,704, dated September 14, 1915.(2) The strip-applying machine 'patent, No. 1,158,278, dated October 26, 1915.(3) The bead closer, the Midgley patent, No. 1,238,318, dated August 28, 1917.(4) The differential adjustment patent, No. 1,263,923, dated April 23, 1918.(5) The control and brake patent, No. 1,432,034, dated October 17, 1922.

The plaintiff charges that the defendant has been guilty of contributory infringement of the first patent, by supplying a machine, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Hobbs v. BeachSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API