Legal Opinion

Loucks v. Van Allen

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1871Published

Ex-parte motion to direct the county treasurer to pay to the surrogate surplus moneys arising on a foreclosure sale.

1Opinion of the CourtLearned, J.

This is a foreclosure sale on which a surplus remains. The mortgagor is dead. The defendants, Samuel Yan Allen and another, administrators of the mortgagor, now move that the court direct the county treasurer, in whose hands the surplus is, to pay the same to the surrogate of Albany county, for distribution, according to Laws of 1867, ch. 658, and the amendatory acts ; and the question is, whether that act applies to a surplus arising from a sale made by order of this court. The language of the act is, “the person or corporation making such sale, or the person holding the same”(l e., the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clark's CaseNew York Supreme Court · 1862

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API