Legal Opinion
Marcotte v. Callahan
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided September 30, 1997No. 1:01-adr-00019PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McAULIFFE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert Marcotte appeals, pursuant to 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g), the decision of the Commissioner denying him social security benefits. The Commissioner’s decision follows a previous remand of this case to consider whether Marcotte’s claimed mental impairment, with his physical impairments, rendered him disabled from work. For the reasons that follow, the Commissioner’s decision is again reversed and remanded.
Background
Local Rule 9.1 requires parties in a social security ease to file a joint statement of material facts that includes “all facts pertinent to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Victoria MANSO-PIZARRO, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lord v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Shaw v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
- Sibley v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Corson v. SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Amanda Michelle Langill v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.