Legal Opinion
Rose v. Shearrer
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 18, 1968No. 14711PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARROW, Chief Justice.
Appellants, Paul P. Rose and Clarence Rinard, architects operating in San Antonio under the firm name of Rinard & Rose, filed this suit to recover the sum of $5,-268.39, alleged to he due under an oral contract to perform architectural services for a proposed shopping center to be constructed by defendant, Samuel Shearrer, together with their attorneys’ fee in the amount of $2,500. A take-nothing judgment was rendered upon a jury verdict and plaintiffs have perfected this appeal.
The petition filed by appellants, although not in the form provided by Rule 185, Texas Rules…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moulton v. Alamo Ambulance Service, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Yelton v. Bird Lime & Cement Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Alamo Ambulance Service, Inc. v. MoultonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Bueche v. EickenrohtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Baylor University v. CarlanderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mergele v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Brown v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Fry v. GuilloteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Wilson v. Brickstone Products CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Porter v. ThalmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.