Legal Opinion

Otto Engdahl v. Department of the Navy

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 17, 1990No. 89-3326Published

1Opinion of the Court

900 F.2d 1572

Otto ENGDAHL, Petitioner,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF the NAVY, Respondent.

No. 89-3326.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

April 17, 1990.

Peter B. Broida, Passman & Broida, Washington, D.C., argued for petitioner.

Hillary A. Stern, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued for respondent. With her on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Stephen J. McHale, Asst. Director.

Before NIES, and MICHEL, Circuit Judges, and DUFF, District Judge.*

2Per curiam

1

Otto Engdahl appeals the decision of the full Merit Systems Protection…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API