Legal Opinion

State v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 31, 1995No. 34376-9-IPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

In this case we are asked to decide whether a defendant who is found guilty of a crime under the current accomplice liability statute has been sufficiently apprised of the nature of the charges against her when the information charged her only as a principal. Although such circumstances did not violate due process under the former accomplice liability statute, Misty Rodriguez argues that the statutory approach to accomplice culpability has changed, requiring reevaluation of the issue. We find that the premise underlying accomplice liability has not changed and affirm Rodriguez’s conviction.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CarothersWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. HarrisWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. Silva-BaltazarWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. McKimWashington Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  2. State v. LeydaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. LeydaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. TrujilloCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API