Carolyn Lazar v. Mark Kroncke
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SILER, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Carolyn Lazar appeals the district court’s grant of Defendant Mark G. Kroncke’s motion to dismiss her second amended answer and cross-claim (“SAACC”). For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the district court’s ruling that Lazar lacks standing to bring her constitutional challenge under the Contracts Clause, but nonetheless affirm the judgment finding that Lazar’s constitutional challenge fails and affirming the district court’s other rulings.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Lazar was married to George Thomas Kroneke (“Decedent”) when he…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Sveen v. MelinSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Barbara Knapke v. Peopleconnect, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Howard Iten v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Student Loan Servicing Alliance v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- NextEra v. LakeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.