Legal Opinion

Sanborn v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 22, 1889No. 16257PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The following are the facts as fofind by the court: I. October 14, 1884, plaintiff was appointed a special deputy marshal in the city of Jersey City, iu the State of New Jersey, by the United States marshal; on the same day he took the oath of office. II.

Read the full summary

The Reporters’ statement of the case: The following are the facts as fofind by the court: I. October 14, 1884, plaintiff was appointed a special deputy marshal in the city of Jersey City, iu the State of New Jersey, by the United States marshal; on the same day he took the oath of office. II. October 14 and 30, the two days of registration of voters prescribed by the laws of New Jersey, and November 4, 1884, election day, plaintiff was assigned to duly at the polls to aid and assist the supervisors of election and preserve order at the polls. III. October 18 and 21 and November 1 and 3,1884,…

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

Under the election laws of New Jersey the boards of registry hold their first meeting on Tuesday three weeks next preceding the general State election, at 7 o’clock in the morning, and remain in session until 8 o’clock at night. The board of registry also meets on Thursday next preceding the day of general election, at the same hour and place as their first meeting, for the purpose of revising and correcting the original register. (“An act to regulate elections,” approved April 18, 1876, sections 164 and 165.)

Plaintiff, having been appointed a special deputy marshal, was assigned to duty at…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barre v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API