Metropolitan Building Co. v. Curtis Studio
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
This is an action of unlawful de-tainer. On January 27, 1917, the respondent, Metropolitan Building Company, being then the owner of a building in the city of Seattle, situated on a tract of land called in the record the University Tract, leased a room therein to one E. S. Curtis, the predecessor in interest of the appellant, Curtis Studio of Seattle, authorizing the lessee to fit up the room and use it as a photographic studio. The duration of the lease depended on the time of the happening of certain events, but these, when they happened, fixed its termination as of January 10,1925. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Matzger v. Arcade Building & Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Phillips v. Port Townsend Lodge, No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Teater v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Sheridan v. O. E. Doherty, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Armstrong v. BurkettWashington Supreme Court · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public PolicyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Stevenson v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Ben Holt Industries, Inc. v. MilneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Himpel v. LindgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Rowland v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.