Legal Opinion

A & B Auto Salvage, Inc. v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 22, 1983No. 11131PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrillo, J.

The present appeal challenges the propriety of the judgment rendered by the trial court granting a writ of mandamus.

The material facts are not in dispute. On May 1, 1977, the plaintiff applied to the defendant zoning board of appeals of the town of East Hartford for a use variance. The board granted the application on May 28, 1977. Subsequently, on June 9,1977, the mayor and the zoning enforcement officer of the town of East Hartford, defendants in the present case, appealed the decision of the board to the Hartford County Court of Common Pleas. Although the plaintiff knew of the pending…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Morris v. GressetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Brown v. Employer's Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. General Development Corp. v. BinsteinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance v. AltholtzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1998
  5. Dessa, LLC v. RiddleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API