United States v. Progressive Farmers Marketing Agency
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Senior District Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from the decision of the district court denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment. The court held that the appellee’s security interest in the debtor’s hogs was not extinguished by the sale of the hogs through the debtor’s agent, the appellant in this action. On appeal, the appellant asserts that the district court erred when it ruled that a livestock marketing agency is not entitled to the protection of the U.C.C. § 9-307(1), arguing that the U.C.C. provides that when the hogs were transferred…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Leas in Interest of O'NealSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. LimbrechtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1976
- United States v. Southeast Mississippi Livestock Farmers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Friend's Stockyard, Inc., United States of America v. Grantsville Community Sale, Inc., A/K/A Grantsville Livestock Auction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Food Services of America v. Royal Heights, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
- United States v. Walter Dunlap & Sons, Inc., in 85-1671. United States of America v. New Holland Sales Stables, Inc., in 85-1673Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Ensminger v. BurtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Sanborn County Bank, Inc. v. Magness Livestock Exchange, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- First Bank of North Dakota (n.a.)--jamestown, a National Banking Association v. The Pillsbury Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.