James S. Holden Co. v. Connor
Michigan Supreme Court
1Concurrence
I dissent from the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice CLARK. The ordinance, quoted in his opinion, was passed after plaintiff acquired the real estate in question. The ordinance may not, in my opinion, be sustained under the police power. It could be sustained under the power of eminent domain if it provided for just compensation to plaintiff. It does not do this, and is, therefore, unconstitutional and void.(a) That one shall not be deprived of property without due process of law, and just compensation therefor, is a fundamental right, guaranteed both by Federal and State Constitutions. The fifth…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Buchanan v. WarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.