Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 16, 1996No. 96-440Published

1Per curiam

Appellant seeks review of a final order summarily denying his motion seeking post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Of the instances of alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel asserted by appellant, only one merits discussion.

Appellant claimed that trial counsel prevented him from testifying in his own defense, notwithstanding his expressed desire to do so. Such a claim is legally sufficient. E.g., Vandenburgh v. State, 658 So.2d 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Wilson v. State, 647 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994). Accordingly, we reverse and remand as to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Vandenburgh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API