J. G. McCrory Co. v. Hanley

This case is here on error. The action below was to recover the value of certain jewels, claimed to have been mislaid by Mrs. Mary Hanley, and thereafter not returned to her while in the store of the J. G. McCrory Company in the city of East Liverpool, on the 10th day of March, 1928. The cause came on to be heard in the court below and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the amount claimed as the value of the jewels, and from that judgment error is prosecuted in this court upon two principal' grounds:

First. That the judgment is> against the weight of the evidence.

Second. That it is…