Legal Opinion · Dissent

North Central Services, Inc. v. Hafdahl

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1981No. 80-228Published

1DissentChief Justice Haswell

*456I would declare section 25-35-403(2), MCA prohibiting trial de novo in the District Court and restricting appeals to questions of law unconstitutional, sever it from the rest of the Act, and declare the balance of the Act constitutional. Accordingly, I would vacate the judgment and remand the case to the District Court for a trial de novo.

I agree with the majority opinion on all points save one. I part company with the majority in its holding that the entire Act is unconstitutional because the appeal procedure which remains after excising section 25-35-403(2), MCA, “is incompatible with the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. City of Missoula v. HolmesMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gullickson v. MitchellMontana Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Fickes v. Missoula CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Martel Construction, Inc. v. Gleason Equipment, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API