Legal Opinion

King v. King

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided January 13, 2004No. 2002-CA-01114-COAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

GRIFFIS, J.,

for the Court.

¶ 1. In King v. King, 760 So.2d 830, 837 (Miss.Ct.App.2000), this Court reversed and remanded this case for findings on the fair market value of the property, for an assessment of the wife’s non-economic contributions, and to reconsider the division of the marital estate according to such findings. On remand, the- chancellor followed the dictates of this Court and awarded Nettie King one-third of the marital estate and $1,700 in unpaid alimony. Nettie appeals this judgment and asserts that the chancellor failed to equitably divide the marital estate. We find no error…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Richardson v. RileyMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Denson v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Trovato v. TrovatoMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Love v. LoveMississippi Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API