Legal Opinion
United States v. Oscar Quiroz
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 20, 1994No. 171, Docket 93-1216PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Per curiam
In United States v. Quiroz, 13 F.3d 505 (2d Cir.1993), we vacated the conviction of Oscar Quiroz and remanded for a new trial on the ground that the district court had erred in admitting postarrest statements . obtained from him in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The government petitions for rehearing on the ground that Quiroz had waived that argument because he faded to object in the district court to the recommendation of the magistrate judge that his motion to suppress the statements be denied. We grant the petition for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Daniel J. LeichtnamCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Herrmann v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Robert A. BeckhamCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Bank of Am. N.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- T. CO METALS, LLC v. Dempsey Pipe & Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Marcus CanadyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Pahuta v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.