State of Minnesota v. John Hoeven
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
North Dakota law drastically restricts hunting privileges of nonresidents as compared to North Dakota residents. Some of those restrictions have come under attack in this lawsuit as invalid under the United States Constitution. Representatives 2 of the neighboring state of Minnesota (collectively “Minnesota”) brought this action against defendants 3 , officials of the State of North Dakota (collectively “North Dakota”). The district court 4 rejected the Minnesota claims and granted summary judgment of dismissal in favor of North Dakota. Minnesota appeals. We affirm the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Minnesota v. HoevenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006