Legal Opinion
Honeyman v. Hanan
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 20, 1937No. 583PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Per curiam
Upon the prior appeal, the cause was remanded for further proceedings to the end that uncertainty might be removed and that the precise nature of the federal question, how it was raised and the grounds of its disposition, might be definitely set forth. 300 U. S. 14, 26. The Court of Appeals of the State has heard reargument and has defined the federal question which it has decided. 275 N. Y. 382; 9 N. E. (2d) 970. The court affirmed a judgment which dismissed the amended complaint upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The case comes here on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Iowa Central Railway Co. v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Gibbes v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Honeyman v. HananSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Gelfert v. National City Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Honeyman v. JacobsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In Re Neil Lafortune and Janice Lafortune, Bankrupts. Neil Lafortune and Janice Lafortune v. Naval Weapons Center Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Sanders v. PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.