Shepherd v. City of Wentzville
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff challenges the denial of his petition for a declaratory judgment in which he sought to have two ordinances establishing utility rates of defendant City declared unreasonable, arbitrary and unconstitutional. The trial court entered judgment in defendant City’s favor.
We affirm.
The City of Wentzville owns and operates a water and sewer system. Ordinance 695 sets the billing rate for city water using a regressive rate schedule, the cost per hundred gallons decreasing as the volume used increases.1
The regressive rate schedule applies to commercial and residential…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Beauty Built Construction Corp. v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Lewis v. M. C.C. of CumberlandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Caldwell v. City of AbileneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- St. Louis Brewing Ass'n v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Kliks v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mullenix - St. Charles Properties, L.P. v. City of St. CharlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- City of Sullivan v. Truckstop Restaurants, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Prange v. PrangeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- State Ex Rel. City of Springfield v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- State ex rel. Empire District Electric Co. v. Public Service CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.