Legal Opinion
Isom v. City of Lubbock
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 30, 1980No. 5497PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALEIGH BROWN, Justice.
Robert Isom and James G. Marshall sought relief by a bill of review challenging the validity of a judgment rendered in another suit in the same district court. Pursuant to City of Lubbock’s motion, the cause was dismissed. Only Robert Isom appeals. We reverse and remand.
City of Lubbock in cause number 92,070 sought a declaratory judgment under the *506provisions of Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 717m (1964) declaring the validity of the City’s authority to issue certain securities. A judgment validating the sale of the securities was entered. Isom intervened in said cause,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kelley v. Bluff Creek Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Deen v. KirkTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Jud v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Dunklin v. LandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
3Cited by2 opinions
- Terry Burns, M.D., and Stephen M. Rapkin v. the City of San Antonio, Texas, Acting by and Through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio, Texas, and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
- Terry Burns, M.D., and Stephen M. Rapkin v. the City of San Antonio, Texas, Acting by and Through the City Public Service Board of San Antonio, Texas, and Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025