Legal Opinion
I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc. v. Podar Brothers
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1981No. 80-1432PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
K. K. HALL, Circuit Judge:
Podar Brothers (Podar) appeals an order of the district court denying its motion to compel arbitration. The court ruled that Podar and I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc. (I.T.A.D.) had contractually agreed to arbitrate their differences, but that Podar’s actions and conduct had waived that agreement. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
This case arises under Chapter 2 of the United States Arbitration Act (Act), which implements the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (Convention), 9 U.S.C. § 201 et…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McCreary Tire & Rubber Company v. Ceat S.P.A. v. Mellon Bank, N.A. GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- City of Parkersburg v. Turner Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by33 opinions
- Intergen N v. v. GrinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Aggarao v. MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Lindo v. NCL (Bahamas), Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- M. Sylvain Ledee v. Ceramiche RagnoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Sedco, Inc. v. Petroleos Mexicanos Mexican National Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.