Legal Opinion
Park v. Ford Motor Company
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided February 13, 2004No. 2002-575-AppealPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, John M. Park (Park), appeals from a Superior Court judgment dismissing his complaint for compensatory damages, injunctive relief, and class certification because Ford Motor Company (Ford) failed to provide him with a “Seeu-riLock” system on a Ford Ranger truck that he purchased from Rizzo Ford, Inc. (Rizzo Ford). The hearing justice dismissed the complaint for lack of subject- matter jurisdiction under G.L.1956 § 8-2-14.
This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument pursuant to an order directing the parties to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
- Chavers v. Fleet Bank (RI), N.A.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
- Providence Journal Co. v. RodgersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Pier House Inn, Inc. v. 421 Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by25 opinions
- In Re Chocolate Confectionary Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- In Re BrownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Long v. Dell, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.