Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack Conrad Choate

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1997No. 95-3960PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge.

Jack Conrad Choate, having pleaded guilty to two counts of wire fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (1994), appeals his sentence. The indictment charged Choate with eight counts of wire fraud for selling franchises by misrepresenting what the buyers would receive for their money and by exaggerating the amount of money the buyers would be able to make through operating the franchises. Choate pleaded guilty to only two counts, but his offense level took into account the relevant conduct in the other counts, as well as similar conduct Choate engaged in while out on bond.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. FetlowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  2. United States v. Gary Thomas MillsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Walter Carl WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Ronald L. HulshofCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald Scott PaulCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Mark Anthony CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Cheryll S. Coon, United States of America v. Ferrell Travis RileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Roger Lynn CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. Frankie Otis ErwinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API