Griswold v. Horne
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.
This is an action for malicious prosecution. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was entered. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied. From the judgment and the order overruling the motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted.
The appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Griswold, who were defendants in the court below, are an elderly couple advanced in years beyond the threescore and ten. For a period of four or five years Miss Rebecca Horne, the appellee, who was plaintiff below, lived in the home of appellants in Phoenix, Arizona, her occupation being that of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hemmens v. . NelsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- P. J. Willis & Bro. v. McNeillTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Wheeler v. NesbittSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Harpham v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Miller v. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff's Dept.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- McClinton v. RiceArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Freezer v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
- Tipton v. BursonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.