Legal Opinion

Barnhill v. Ow

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1937No. 32,906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wedell, J.:

This was an action on a promissory note. Defendant prevailed, and plaintiffs appeal.

Defendant admitted execution and delivery of the note, but de*697fended on the ground the note was given without consideration, solely for the accommodation of the plaintiff payees and upon the representation he would not be required to pay the note or any part thereof. The answer further pleaded the representations made by the payees were fraudulent, untrue and false, and were made for the sole purpose of persuading and inducing him to execute the note, that he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Underwood v. FoshaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  3. Toll v. Monitor Binding & Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
  4. Means v. Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Collis v. KraftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bisagno v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API